Epic battles in practical ethics: Virtue ethics vs Consequentialism

Aristotle, right, and John Stuart Mill, left

(For two previous examples of “epic battles in practical ethics,” see here and here.)

There are three great philosophical frameworks to think about ethics (and a number of minor ones and variations thereof): deontology (i.e., rule-based), consequentialism, and virtue ethics. In this essay I will not consider the first one, the most famous examples…

--

--

--

by Massimo Pigliucci. Practical philosophy, science, pseudoscience & good reasoning. Complete index of articles at https://massimopigliucci.blog/essays/

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Minimalism and its sudden rise to mainstream stardom

Delineating Academic Philosophy, “Casual” Philosophy & “Spiritual” Philosophy

The ethics of suicide — assisted or not

Book Club: The Inner Citadel, 8, The discipline of action, in the service of humanity

Substance Dualism: the Creationism of the 21st Century

Intelligence

The Actual Abortion Debate

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Philosophy as a Way of Life

Philosophy as a Way of Life

by Massimo Pigliucci. Practical philosophy, science, pseudoscience & good reasoning. Complete index of articles at https://massimopigliucci.blog/essays/

More from Medium

Jonathan Rée on Truth, Relativism and Science (2)

Consciousness, decision making, and “free” will

Introduction to “Pyrrho’s Way: The Ancient Greek Version of Buddhism”

Why Stoics Should Not Be Indifferent to the Indifferents